Title: India to buy S'pore howitzers
Orcishwarrior - March 12, 2009 06:02 AM (GMT)
NEW DELHI, March 12 — Singapore is the front runner to supply the Indian military's planned purchase of ultralight howitzers, the Republic's first major defence contract from South Asia's dominant power, people familiar with the developments said.
"Most of the technical evaluation of the contract to buy 145 pieces of the ultra-lightweight 155mm cannons has been done," said an Indian official who has proved reliable in the past.
Should the deal come through - possibly after field trials - it will be a major breakthrough for Singapore into India's arms market and help boost its economy's sagging export order-book.
The value of the contract is believed to be about S$1 billion (RM2.3 billion).
ST Kinetics confirmed that it had participated in the tender for the Indian army's ultra-lightweight howitzer and towed howitzer requirements.
"As with all our commercial and defence negotiations, we are bound by customers" confidentiality requirements," a company spokesman in Singapore said.
New Delhi, reliant on the Soviet Union and its successor state Russia for most of its defence needs, has embarked on a plan to diversify its arms purchases. Israel is nudging Russia to be the top supplier while US companies are eyeing major deals with the Indian Air Force and Indian
Navy.
ST Kinetic's Pegasus ultralight howitzers, which weigh just above 5 tonnes, are capable of firing three rounds in 24 seconds. Heavy use of titanium and light alloy aluminium gives the machines both mobility and ruggedness.
The Pegasus can be transported by helicopter as well as fixed wing aircraft.
In the case of India's military that would probably mean Mi-26 heavy lift helicopters and Ilyushin 76 aircraft.
Only two companies, ST Kinetics and BAe Systems have weapons that match India's specifications for the ultralight guns. It was not clear if BAe had bid for the contract, though the Britain-based company is said to have displayed the weapon at a trade event in India last year.
Singapore also was included in the list of nations to which India sent the Request for Proposals for the heavier 52-calibre howitzers, people familiar with the issue said.
That contract, for which there are several more bidders, envisages the outright purchase of 400 artillery pieces and licensed production in India of another 1,180 pieces.
The tender for the ultralight cannons does not include a clause for licensed production in India, according to people who have seen the documents. — The Straits Times
bdique - March 12, 2009 06:17 AM (GMT)
i recall there was another tender for lightweight howitzers from India involving the Pegasus and the M777...in the end it was cancelled due to ammo type issues...is this a ressurected form of the deal, or something entirely new?
wd1 - March 12, 2009 04:31 PM (GMT)
$1bil sounds expensive for 145 guns.
on another note; while there are undoubtedly many other factors that will be weighed in the Indian Army decision, i can't help but wonder if STK's and BAe's relative ability and willingness to play 'under the table' might play a part in the eventual decision. BAe is known to have done so in the past, though i am not sure about STK in this regard. this would likely not have been an issue with UK MoD in our Bronco sale, but with the Indians things could be different.
wonder also if the high(?) price is related to the above.
dtwn - March 12, 2009 05:47 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (bdique @ Mar 12 2009, 02:17 PM) |
| i recall there was another tender for lightweight howitzers from India involving the Pegasus and the M777...in the end it was cancelled due to ammo type issues...is this a ressurected form of the deal, or something entirely new? |
http://militarynuts.com/index.php?showtopi...dpost&p=9983436http://militarynuts.com/index.php?showtopic=2317As I recall, neither guns would fulfill the requirement in entirety.
Always nice to see our hardware in action.
FIVE-TWO - March 12, 2009 06:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (wd1 @ Mar 13 2009, 12:31 AM) |
$1bil sounds expensive for 145 guns.
on another note; while there are undoubtedly many other factors that will be weighed in the Indian Army decision, i can't help but wonder if STK's and BAe's relative ability and willingness to play 'under the table' might play a part in the eventual decision. BAe is known to have done so in the past, though i am not sure about STK in this regard. this would likely not have been an issue with UK MoD in our Bronco sale, but with the Indians things could be different.
wonder also if the high(?) price is related to the above. |
SGD1B for 145 pieces comes to USD4.5M each, presumably inclusive of spares, tools, training, etc. is that high?
spiderweb6969 - March 12, 2009 07:42 PM (GMT)
from The Straits Times 12 March 2009
dtwn - March 12, 2009 07:48 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (spiderweb6969 @ Mar 13 2009, 03:42 AM) |
from The Straits Times 12 March 2009
|
To be honest, the Streakers article caught more of my attention. :)
Thanks for sharing.
Interesting to note that the gunners are carrying M16s though.
weasel1962 - March 13, 2009 12:54 AM (GMT)
Yup, read unconfirmed reports in Sep last year that BAE had issues with IA's requirement for the howitzer to be able to fire its existing stock of 155mm ammunition.
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2008_09_01_archive.htmlIf the report is correct, weight doesn't appear to be that significant an advantage for the M-777. Medium lift helos do have limits on how high and far guns can be carried.
India doesn't have significant heavy lift capability but has floated a tender for heavy lift helos. The contenders are the Ch-47, Ch-53 and Mi-26.
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2009/01/boein...-comparing.html http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com/2009/01/s...helicopter.htmlAccording to Prasun Sengupta's blog above, who writes for Janes regularly, the requirement is for 16+6 utility which would mean 1 sqn that will service the 14X howitzers.
FIVE-TWO - March 13, 2009 02:44 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (weasel1962 @ Mar 13 2009, 08:54 AM) |
Yup, read unconfirmed reports in Sep last year that BAE had issues with IA's requirement for the howitzer to be able to fire its existing stock of 155mm ammunition.
|
and the Pegasus can?
spiderweb6969 - March 13, 2009 10:00 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (dtwn @ Mar 13 2009, 03:48 AM) |
To be honest, the Streakers article caught more of my attention. :)
Thanks for sharing.
Interesting to note that the gunners are carrying M16s though. |
it's something to laugh at if the deal didnt go thru....like, we cry for the loss but laugh at the other news :D
Dzirhan - March 13, 2009 10:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (weasel1962 @ Mar 13 2009, 08:54 AM) |
According to Prasun Sengupta's blog above, who writes for Janes regularly, the requirement is for 16+6 utility which would mean 1 sqn that will service the 14X howitzers. |
Prasun does not write for Janes as far as I'm aware of, he writes for Tempur and some other publications
Shotgun - March 13, 2009 06:32 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (dtwn @ Mar 13 2009, 03:48 AM) |
| QUOTE (spiderweb6969 @ Mar 13 2009, 03:42 AM) | from The Straits Times 12 March 2009
|
To be honest, the Streakers article caught more of my attention. :)
Thanks for sharing.
Interesting to note that the gunners are carrying M16s though.
|
So now it stands at NTU 2 - 2 NUS. =D
weasel1962 - March 13, 2009 11:26 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dzirhan @ Mar 13 2009, 06:21 PM) |
| QUOTE (weasel1962 @ Mar 13 2009, 08:54 AM) |
According to Prasun Sengupta's blog above, who writes for Janes regularly, the requirement is for 16+6 utility which would mean 1 sqn that will service the 14X howitzers. |
Prasun does not write for Janes as far as I'm aware of, he writes for Tempur and some other publications
|
I tot I recall seeing his name in jdw but you are definitely in a better position to know. Thanks.
Principally Prasun, who is based in KL, Malaysia, was special project editor for Asian Defence Journal. During that time, he did write articles for Tempur and Force.
spiderweb6969 - March 14, 2009 03:32 AM (GMT)
Any idea if STK coming up with similar video Rafael's been making ala Bollywood? dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dee......
stars - March 14, 2009 03:54 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (spiderweb6969 @ Mar 14 2009, 11:32 AM) |
| Any idea if STK coming up with similar video Rafael's been making ala Bollywood? dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dingga! dingga dingga dee...... |
lol, can recycle some of our National day song for promo video. :ph43r:
can imagine a pegasus one.
you and me, will build big gun,
stand together, gun to gun
together we can show the world,
what pegasus can be !
we got big gun
we have big guns.(buns ?)
bdique - March 14, 2009 05:48 PM (GMT)
wow, with that kind of export videos...I dunno what to say man haha...
LionFlyer - June 7, 2009 01:42 PM (GMT)
According to ST today, the SLWH bid has hit snags with the arrest of the retired OFB head on suspicion of corruption. Not STK per say but the whole bid now have been freezed, pending the outcome of the investigation.
IAF - June 13, 2009 04:22 AM (GMT)
Ban on defence firms will delay artillery upgrade: India Army Chief
Read more
here
IAF - June 13, 2009 04:26 AM (GMT)
ST Big Guns right now in India, that is the top management, trying to
salvage arty deal
xtemujin - June 29, 2009 06:51 AM (GMT)
Monday, Jun 29, 2009
Despite ban, Singapore guns arrive for trials K.V. Prasad
NEW DELHI: The Defence Ministry could consider the option of acquiring 155mm light howitzers from an alternative supplier following its decision to “put on hold” acquisitions from Singapore Technologies among other firms.
The company was the only vendor left to supply the howitzers after the other seller pulled out from the bidding. Top sources in the Ministry said a decision would be taken in due course even as a consignment of the howitzer guns (Pegasus SLWH) from Singapore Technologies, arrived in India recently for field trials.
However, the Ministry appears in no mood to relent from blacklisting, for the time being at least, seven firms whose names figured in the CBI probe into the corruption allegations against former Ordnance Factory Board chief, Sudipto Ghosh.
The sources said attempts were made by representatives of both the Singapore company and the Israeli Military Industries to meet Defence Secretary Vijay Singh, but they were not granted audience.
However, having received communication from these two firms following the ban, the Ministry approached the CBI seeking information on the allegations of transfer of money by them to personal accounts.
It is understood that some evidence pointing to transfers of money was detected even though in one case it was not directly linked to the plan to procure the ultra-light howitzers, the sources said.
With the Defence Minister having declared a ‘zero-tolerance’ to corruption policy, sources said it was time to send a strong message that any reports of misdeeds would not be acceptable.
Aware that such an action could lead to delay in procuring equipment, the Ministry might explore the option of getting these guns under the foreign military sales route.
http://www.hindu.com/2009/06/29/stories/2009062959411000.htm
FIVE-TWO - June 29, 2009 10:19 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (xtemujin @ Jun 29 2009, 02:51 PM) |
Aware that such an action could lead to delay in procuring equipment, the Ministry might explore the option of getting these guns under the foreign military sales route. |
this could only mean going for the M777 right?
FIVE-TWO - June 29, 2009 10:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (spiderweb6969 @ Mar 13 2009, 06:00 PM) |
| QUOTE (dtwn @ Mar 13 2009, 03:48 AM) | To be honest, the Streakers article caught more of my attention. :)
Thanks for sharing.
Interesting to note that the gunners are carrying M16s though. |
it's something to laugh at if the deal didnt go thru....like, we cry for the loss but laugh at the other news :D
|
spidey got telepathy :ph43r:
bdique - June 29, 2009 12:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (FIVE-TWO @ Jun 29 2009, 06:21 PM) |
| QUOTE (spiderweb6969 @ Mar 13 2009, 06:00 PM) | | QUOTE (dtwn @ Mar 13 2009, 03:48 AM) | To be honest, the Streakers article caught more of my attention. :)
Thanks for sharing.
Interesting to note that the gunners are carrying M16s though. |
it's something to laugh at if the deal didnt go thru....like, we cry for the loss but laugh at the other news :D
|
spidey got telepathy :ph43r:
|
touch wood touch wood!!! :P
Grunt - November 12, 2009 02:23 PM (GMT)
Latest Indian news update that impacts ST Kinetics:
| QUOTE |
Govt eases arms firm blacklist rules
New Delhi, Nov. 11: Two banned companies — a Singaporean firm vying for a billion-dollar order for artillery guns and an Israeli arms supplier — are hoping for a reprieve after the government today said it has amended the rules under which they were blacklisted in June.
The defence ministry has amended the rules that may allow the companies to participate in trials and tests but not to conclude contracts before the CBI completes its investigation.
The two firms are on a list of seven with whom the defence ministry froze all business after a preliminary CBI investigation suspected they had bribed the former chief of the Ordnance Factories’ Board, Sudipta Ghosh, who was arrested in Calcutta in May.
Defence ministry sources said the rules were being announced after they were vetted by the Central Vigilance Commission and the law ministry.
“It is not our intention to favour this or that company. We are just saying this is how the companies will be dealt with because we have had business with them,” an officer said.
Singapore Technologies had to fly back two ultra-light howitzers, named Pegasus, after they landed in Mumbai in a specially chartered aircraft on June 5, the day A.K. Antony’s defence ministry announced the list of companies it was banning just after Ghosh’s arrest.
The decision froze the trials for the artillery guns for which ST flew in the howitzers. The freezing of business with the companies hit the armed forces hard.
The Indian Army, for example, has not acquired a single piece of heavy artillery in 22 years and a Rs 1,200 crore project to make ammunition for its Bofors guns in collaboration with Israeli Military Industries (IMI) is delayed by more than six years.
Israeli Military Industries was contracted in March this year — a month before Ghosh retired in April — to partner the Ordnance Factory in Nalanda for a Rs 1,200-crore project to make bi-modular propellant charges — ammunition for the army’s Bofors guns. It is also in a joint venture with the Ordnance Factory in Khamaria in Madhya Pradesh to make “cargo ammunition”, cluster bombs designed to maim.
Singapore Technologies, and a subsidiary, ST Kinetics, apart from participating in the competition for ultra-light howitzers with its Pegasus gun, is also involved with ordnance factories in producing combat vehicles.
After the services’ headquarters were prompted by the ministry to hasten acquisitions, they sought directions on how to deal with the blacklisted companies. Antony referred the issue to the Central Vigilance Commission and the law ministry before amending the rules.
The new rules will govern business with companies in accordance with the “Integrity Pact” (no-bribery clause) where contracts have been signed.
Terms laid down in a tender will govern companies vying for an order if the process of trials and testing has started. The armed forces should not deal with any of the companies named in the FIR by the CBI if they are not in the middle of a tender process, the new rules lay down.
The five other companies, apart from ST and IMI, named in the CBI FIR on Ghosh are: BVT of Poland, Media Architects Pte Ltd of Singapore, T.S. Kishan and Company Pvt Ltd, R.K. Machine Tools, and HYT Engineering, the last three being Indian firms.
In the past, Denel of South Africa was blacklisted after allegations that it had paid bribes to win a contract from the Indian armed forces to supply anti-materiel rifles. Bofors and HDW of Germany were also blacklisted.
Blacklisting can often prove counterproductive for the armed forces because it slows down modernisation programmes. |
bdique - November 12, 2009 04:06 PM (GMT)
lets hope this deal gets through...has BAE's M777s been tested by Indian officials already?
Alfie007 - November 12, 2009 04:22 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (bdique @ Nov 13 2009, 12:06 AM) |
| lets hope this deal gets through...has BAE's M777s been tested by Indian officials already? |
Hmmm, hope so.. If only ST Kinetics have promoted their products just like the way Israeli's Rafael have done to promote their missiles at Aero India 2009, bollywood style.. Must be pretty interesting.. hehe.. :lol:
The Rafael Ad to the Indian Market:Israeli Rafael's Indian promo
who - November 17, 2009 01:06 PM (GMT)
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4373211&c=POL&s=TOPSingapore Tech Banned From Indian Gun Bid[/SIZE]
NEW DELHI - Singapore Technologies will not be allowed to participate in an Indian tender for 155mm ultra-light artillery guns because it was named in an alleged corruption scandal in June this year by India's fraud investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The move is the outcome of the latest circular from the Indian Defence Ministry, which does not allow tainted defense companies to participate in the procurement process pending a full CBI report, ministry sources said.
"Where the tender process has not started, there should be no dealing with the companies in the First Information Report until finalization of the investigation," a ministry source added.
With South African company Denel still blacklisted in India following a 2005 bribery case, Singapore Technologies was the front runner in the $1 billion tender to provide 155mm light howitzers for the Army's use in mountainous terrain.
The government has frozen the howitzer tender for now because only one bidder, BAE Systems, remains, and single-vendor defense procurements are not permitted.
In June 2009, seven companies were added to the list of those banned from Defence Ministry procurement bids: Singapore Technologies, Israel Military Industries, Poland's BVT, Singapore's Media Architects, and domestic companies HYT Engg, T.S. Kishan and R.K. Machine Tools. All seven figured in corruption charges filed against the former director-general of India's Ordnance Factory Board, Sudipta Ghosh. The Defence Ministry had blacklisted these seven companies following advice from the CBI, but the latest circular officially ends Singapore Technologies' part in the ultra-light howitzer tender.
I bet 90cents wont print this
LionFlyer - November 17, 2009 01:41 PM (GMT)
well, that's dumb. They just banned everyone who can provide them what they need
Sayaret - November 17, 2009 02:20 PM (GMT)
The Indians want to look clean... but am sure after awhile when all has blown over am sure they will reopen the bidding...at the same time, am sure there is another around it for them....by having a third party who buys the hardware and then sold to the Indians.... :P
Alfie007 - November 17, 2009 02:23 PM (GMT)
I thought one is innocent until proven guilty?? :blink:
FIVE-TWO - November 17, 2009 02:28 PM (GMT)
for those who have to work with Indian entities (whether private enterprises or public organisations) this would be so completely unsurprising. Now you know why CAAS pulled out of one of their airport projects, and they had to compren to LKY to get CAAS to revisit the project? AFAIK that project still did not go anywhere.
stars - November 17, 2009 02:51 PM (GMT)
will CPIB investigate STK for this ?
iirc, the prevention of corruption act allows prosecution of any singaporeans caught in the act of corruption beyond singapore. but then again, the arms business has always been a less than scrupulous industry. im not sure about this.
FIVE-TWO - November 17, 2009 04:12 PM (GMT)
CPIB will not act unless they receive a complaint.
Grunt - November 18, 2009 12:16 AM (GMT)
The challenge of selling arms to a 3rd world country... lah! According to Ajai Shukla, it is routine Indian business practice to level allegations against another arms seller (if one loses). Whether the accusation has any truth or not is another matter. Keep in mind that STK, and the parent company, ST, are Singapore companies and the directors are subject to Singapore laws.
| QUOTE (Ajai Shukla) |
No Thanks Youre Blacklisted!
Business Standard, 17th Nov 09 -- Over this last decade, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has “blacklisted” so many foreign arms corporations that the military’s modernisation plan has virtually stalled. The MoD “blacklist” is not a formal document; an arms vendor is mostly embargoed unofficially, when senior bureaucrats agree that it is playing dirty.
The hit list reads like a Who’s Who of global weapons suppliers, including corporations with good records of delivering arms to India. Starting with Bofors in the late 1980s, the list grew to include Denel of South Africa; Israel Military Industries (IMI); Singapore Technologies Kinetic (STK); and now Thales of France. Earlier this year the world’s biggest defence contractor, Lockheed Martin, was on the blacklist. Now another global giant, BAE Systems, seems headed there after problems with setting up an assembly line in HAL Bangalore for the Hawk jet trainer.
It is hardly news that arms sales and corruption walk together. Arms vendors routinely bribe political leaders, bureaucrats and senior military officers, not just in India but worldwide. BAE Systems allegedly bribed Saudi Arabian royals with hundreds of millions of dollars in the infamous Al Yamamah contracts. Thales, credibly accused of bribing South African presidential hopeful, Jacob Zuma, is also being sued by Taiwan to recover US $590 million allegedly paid in kickbacks to win a deal for six warships. Most arms companies maintain multi-million dollar slush funds to ease the way for their giant deals.
But the Indian MoD is wholly wrong in behaving as if the problem is just one of predatory arms corporations. All those bribes are being paid to somebody; but no Indian MoD official is in jail for having accepted a bribe. Instead South Block’s vendor blacklists grow longer and longer.
These blacklists are now choking defence procurement. The Indian Army’s artillery firepower is grossly inadequate today because --- starting from the original Bofors scandal --- every time an artillery gun looks like it may be selected by the army, a cloud comes over its vendors. In recent years, the Bofors 155mm towed howitzer has been the standout candidate in repeated Indian trials. But the cloud over Bofors has never really lifted, even though it is now owned by the UK-headquartered BAE Systems.
In the procurement of tracked guns South African company, Denel, was to fit a gun turret on the Arjun tank chassis. That was scuttled in 2005 when Denel was unofficially blacklisted over bribery allegations, never proved, in another sale. That also blocked a crucial ammunition factory, being built in George Fernandes’ constituency, Nalanda, for which Denel was providing technology. In 2007, Israel Military Industries replaced Denel as technology partner; this June, after former Ordnance Factories Board (OFB) chairman, Sudipta Ghosh was arrested, IMI was prohibited as well. The Nalanda factory languishes.
Also ostracised after Ghosh’s arrest was Singapore Technologies Kinetic, whose Pegasus ultralight howitzer was the lone gun being evaluated for the army’s mountain divisions. Despite strong protests from the army (Business Standard, 18th July 09) that crucial procurement remains blocked. Two new mountain divisions for the Sino-Indian border are being starved of artillery.
“Today, anyone who wants to block an important Indian arms purchase has only to level an allegation against the vendor”, complains an Indian army officer furiously. “Anonymous letters, motivated charges, press reports, whatever… just kick-start an investigation and the MoD will kill the procurement. This is now routine business practice for rival arms dealers and, sooner or later, Pakistan and China will realise how easy it is to stop vital purchases from going through.”
Former OFB Chairman, Sudipta Ghosh, was granted bail in July after the CBI failed to file a charge sheet against him. But the seven arms companies (4 foreign and 3 Indian), which were blacklisted after his arrest, remain proscribed.
This situation, ironically, is rooted in Defence Minister AK Antony’s crusade against corruption. But his onslaught has entirely bypassed wrongdoing within his own ministry. And, increasingly, US companies are being let off the hook in situations where lesser mortals might have paid a heavier price. Lockheed Martin, discovered with classified information, was ordered to dispense with the services of its India CEO, Ambassador Douglas Hartwick (Business Standard, 13th July 09). But it remains in contention for the IAF’s lucrative medium fighter contract.
Similarly, even after the US Department of Justice revealed that the subsidiaries of two US companies, York Navy Systems and Textron, paid bribes to secure defence contracts in India, these companies face no blacklists or restrictions.
In a procurement environment characterised by paranoia, blacklists, and dwindling vendor options, India will inevitably drift towards sourcing most of its defence sales from the US, using the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) route. In this, New Delhi will provide Washington with its requirements; the Pentagon will nominate a vendor and negotiate a price; India will pay and and receive the equipment. This will be non-controversial in terms of corruption and kickbacks, but renew dependency on Washington in the crucial military arena. |
1. Background: The Indian army's artillery directorate had already planned to replace all of its existing artillery guns with 155mm howitzers as per a 2000 policy decision after the Kargil battle of 1999, when Swedish Bofors howitzers helped the army evict Muslim fundamentalists backed by Pakistan in the upper reaches of Jammu and Kashmir.
1.1 The first Request for Proposal (RfP) dealt with the acquisition of 140 ultra-light howitzers (Note: The STK corruption allegations ironically have nothing to do with the ultra-light howitzer deal. The allegations arise from the proposal to supply SAR-21 MMS to Indian policemen after the OFB-developed AMOGH had failed during trials held by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs. I believe STK is a victim of OFB's internal politics over the supply of the AMOGH).
1.2 The second RfP dealt with 180 self-propelled guns.
1.3 The biggest RfP was for the 155mm 52-calibre towed guns. Under it, India plans to buy 400 guns off-the-shelf and licensed production of another 1,100.
2. BAE refuses to play by Indian MOD rules: In Sept 2008, it was reported that according to Julian Scopes, BAE Systems' new president of India operations, the trial requirements had impossibly broad ammunition compatibility requirements -- that the tender required that the gun fielded be capable of firing all available 155mm ammunition in the Indian Army's artillery inventory. Hence BAE had decided that it cannot participate in the tender under the current trial requirements demanded in the MOD's RfP.
3. Incompetent Indian officialdom: According to
Aviation Week, the incompetent Indian officialdom has managed to prevent the Indian army from conducting the trails that would lead to acquisition of 140 ultra-light howitzers under the first request for proposal (RfP). As a result, the Indian army's artillery modernization plans are put on hold until it is decided whether or when the RfP will be reissued. How incompetent? Let us set out the facts reported thus far:
3.1 According to ST Kinetics, there was no official advisory from the Indian authority on the temporary suspension of business activities in relation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation of former director-general of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB).
3.2 It was reported that:
(i) Following the ban, "ST Kinetics has since approached the authority for clarifications and presented to the ministry a list of all our business activities in India. While awaiting a response from the ministry, we have offered all cooperation to assist with any investigation as appropriate and hope that the ministry will quickly review the matter and clear ST Kinetics' reputation," ST Kinetics spokesman Gaius Ho said.
(ii) "We do not have any Joint Venture with OFB and have not signed any agreement with OFB," said Gaius Ho. ST Kinetics says OFB approached it when the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs was looking for a modern rifle, as the OFB's rifles had failed during internal trials. "ST Kinetics' SAR21 was presented for trials and evaluation. The discussion was for ST Kinetics to license its intellectual property to OFB if the MHA should decide to select the SAR21 and award a contract. There has been no decision to date," Ho explained.
* For more details, read this
link which documents the infighting that prevented the Indian policemen from obtaining modern carbines (despite the well known fact that Indian police are equipped with antiquated rifles). If a similar 26/11 Mumbai attack were to take place today, the Indian police would still be equipped with the same antiquated rifles.
(iii) "We are perturbed by the change of events and feel strongly that we have not been fairly treated as a legitimate bidder who is committed to helping the Indian MoD with its modernization efforts," Ho added. "ST Kinetics is definitely a victim of the whole situation."
3.3 The Indian defense ministry did not inform ST Kinetics of the postponement of the trials for the guns until June 5, around four days after the guns had been delivered in Mumbai.
who - December 30, 2009 12:35 PM (GMT)
Well its on again...
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4435382&c=ASI&s=LANIndia To Let Singapore Technologies Join Howitzer TrialsBy VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI
Published: 28 Dec 2009 13:29
NEW DELHI - The Indian government has allowed the Army to invite formerly banned Singapore Technologies to participate in trials to purchase 155mm/52 caliber towed artillery guns.
The company had been banned, along with six other defense companies, in June 2009 in connection with alleged corruption charges. However, the government's move now will allow trials to be held within a month, said a senior Indian Army official.
A senior Indian Defence Ministry official said that even if it wins, Singapore Technologies will not be given a contract until it is cleared of all charges by India's Central Bureau of Investigation.
In March 2008, the Indian Army had floated a tender for the off-the-shelf purchase of 400 155 mm/52 caliber towed artillery guns and the licensed production of approximately 1,180 guns on a transfer-of-technology basis.
Tenders were given to eight companies from Europe, Asia and the Middle East, but in the end the Army's Technical Evaluation Committee qualified only BAE Systems and Singapore Technologies.
Singapore Technologies is also competing to sell 155mm ultra light artillery guns, although it is unclear if the company will be allowed to participate in field trials, Indian Defence Ministry sources said.
| QUOTE |
A senior Indian Defence Ministry official said that even if it wins, Singapore Technologies will not be given a contract until it is cleared of all charges by India's Central Bureau of Investigation.
|
wow like that also can...
Callsign 24 Seira - December 30, 2009 12:53 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (who @ Dec 30 2009, 08:35 PM) |
Well its on again...
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4435382&c=ASI&s=LAN
India To Let Singapore Technologies Join Howitzer Trials By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI Published: 28 Dec 2009 13:29
NEW DELHI - The Indian government has allowed the Army to invite formerly banned Singapore Technologies to participate in trials to purchase 155mm/52 caliber towed artillery guns.
The company had been banned, along with six other defense companies, in June 2009 in connection with alleged corruption charges. However, the government's move now will allow trials to be held within a month, said a senior Indian Army official.
A senior Indian Defence Ministry official said that even if it wins, Singapore Technologies will not be given a contract until it is cleared of all charges by India's Central Bureau of Investigation.
In March 2008, the Indian Army had floated a tender for the off-the-shelf purchase of 400 155 mm/52 caliber towed artillery guns and the licensed production of approximately 1,180 guns on a transfer-of-technology basis.
Tenders were given to eight companies from Europe, Asia and the Middle East, but in the end the Army's Technical Evaluation Committee qualified only BAE Systems and Singapore Technologies.
Singapore Technologies is also competing to sell 155mm ultra light artillery guns, although it is unclear if the company will be allowed to participate in field trials, Indian Defence Ministry sources said.
| QUOTE | A senior Indian Defence Ministry official said that even if it wins, Singapore Technologies will not be given a contract until it is cleared of all charges by India's Central Bureau of Investigation.
|
wow like that also can...
|
Patience ....once they have clear up their bureaucracy, they should be able made the right decision
FIVE-TWO - December 30, 2009 02:03 PM (GMT)
there is a derogatory cantonese phrase about doing business with Indians :P
神仙难赚吉宁钱。
Iowa_BB61 - December 30, 2009 02:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (FIVE-TWO @ Dec 30 2009, 10:03 PM) |
there is a derogatory cantonese phrase about doing business with Indians :P
神仙难赚吉宁钱
|
We have Indians from WAFF here, please mind your language. :P
IceStorm - December 30, 2009 10:06 PM (GMT)
and according to indian news paper...
| QUOTE |
| Two other contracts for light-weight assault rifles and light strike vehicles for special forces — for both, Singapore Technologies is a contender — will also go ahead with trials. |
and of course the accusations are...
| QUOTE |
The Attorney General is understood to have opined that it would be in public interest if field trials and evaluations could proceed, but no contracts should be finalised till the CBI concluded its probe. The CBI’s status report — dispatched weeks before the announcement of field trials being cleared — is thus important. The CBI has informed the MoD that the current status of the blacklisted firms is as follows:
• Singapore Technologies-Kinetics: Sudipta Ghosh received kickbacks from the firm for the OFB contract for joint manufacture of a 5.56 mm carbine to be procured by the Home Ministry for use of paramilitary forces.
• Israeli Military Industries: Bribes were paid by IMI to Ghosh through his relative, Ashish Bose, when the company received the advance payment of Rs 149.50 crore for the project for manufacture of 155mm Bi-modular charge systems (BMCS’s). |
pirate - January 2, 2010 07:53 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| The government has authorised an outright purchase of 145 ultra-light howitzers from the US, a highly-placed defence ministry source said today. |